Atmospheric radiative transfer using simplified gray models
Applied optical depth (τ) and log-scaling to model vertical structure
Used infrared absorption cross-sections to interpret greenhouse effects (CO₂, H₂O bands)
Constructed temperature–optical depth profiles for comparative planetology
Learned about non-gray effects, convection, and cloud albedo impacts
Critically analyzed model limitations
I modeled temperature profiles with optical depth, greenhouse parameters, and gas absorption features trying to understand exoplanet atmospheres and how the composition, particularly the amount of CO₂ may affect these models.
Y-axis (Optical Depth, τ): On a log scale, ranging from the top of the atmosphere (low τ) to deeper layers (high τ). The plot is inverted to reflect increasing depth downward (similar to atmospheric cross-sections)
X-axis (Temperature, K): Temperature profile from cold upper atmosphere to warmer lower atmosphere.
Blue Curve (Earth-like atmosphere): Earth’s temperature structure assuming moderate greenhouse effect (τ ≈ 1), producing surface temperatures around ~288 K.
Orange Curve (CO₂-rich atmosphere): Simulates a planet with much thicker atmosphere (τ ≈ 6), leading to enhanced greenhouse warming and a higher surface temperature.
Red Vertical Lines: Mark where CO₂ absorbs strongly in the infrared. 4.3 μm and 15 μm bands, with corresponding Wien temperatures around 674 K and 193 K.
Green Vertical Lines: Show H₂O IR absorption features. 2.7 μm (~1073 K) and 6.3 μm (~460 K).
I chose to use a simplified gray atmosphere:
Teq: Equilibrium temperature
In order to determine what the value is for the Earth's predicted atmosphere using this tactic, I used the following variables to determine:
A τ of 1 is fairly appropriate for simulating an Earth-like atmosphere (with an optically thin / moderately thin atmosphere). Therefore, my simulation of an Earth-like atmosphere resulted in:
The actual surface temperature of Earth is approximately 288K, so 263K is an alright approximation for such a simplified model. Some of the factors I considered that may be contributing to the temperature being low could be:
The model only accounts for radiative equilibrium, not convection (which warms the lower atmosphere)
No internal heat flux or cloud effects are accounted for in this model
The albedo may be too high
This is a simplified greenhouse, so the actual Earth's atmosphere has IR windows and non-gray opacity that shape the profile